Sovereign Pakistani Parliament Cannot Convict Musharraf

Last week was some how overshadowed by the magnitude of confrontation witnessed in the National Assembly, after nearly a break of one decade. Where Ch. Nisar and Haider Abbas were seen holding on to each other by the horns evidently, in reality the 342 member parliament has sealed its fate for years to come. Once again by themselves the politicians and political forces have given a vacuum first for a convict to escape and secondly another culprit to emerge some time soon.

I don’t know but my ears get sick of listening to the manifesto presented before the masses after the elections last year. It seems like a new breed of politicians have evolved, bathed from the holy waters of democracy, when all we heard was that “national reconciliation” and “parliament sovereignty” as the talk of the town. In the books of wisdom new additions were made that no matter how much oppression you are subjected to, democracy will fight it out. Amazing!

Mr. P.M, honorable Gilani has so softly rung the defeat bells for parliament in terms of Musharraf trial by saying that Article 6 will be an option if it is possible and “lets do the doable” are indeed not the words which one would like to hear from a man, who holds the key to the most sovereign institute in the country. Any way, especially the idealist opposition in the shape of PML-N was day dreaming until now if they had in mind that Mush will stand trial, as far the current time is concerned. Whether a foreign hand or a hidden hand, simply written the lack of “will” is the real factor.

But at the same time one is also amazed by the priorities in the mind of our political players. Where nation is still searching for answer to questions like have they overcome the Taliban dilemma, whether we will spend the next year again without adequate electricity or will there be any flour and sugar left for the consumer, the establishment has the other way around. In terms of reconciliation we have a visible answer that what they really mean by it. One still sees Balochistan as neglected as ever, still a fight is under way for the prized throne of Punjab and now Mr. Holbrook will be the person to decide the fate of local bodies’ government in Pakistan.

What we want from them is that for once stop playing with words and be honest to the nation what you really care. Instead of sorting out what is “doable”, it will be better that from now on do what you can and accept what you cannot. The whole crisis seems to be a personal feud or clash between two individuals, in which they always find a playing field to carry it on. We know very well what has already been settled in terms of drones, at least its still time to stop what is coming in the shape of American colonization of Pakistan (the new consulate in Islamabad and 7,000 marines).

It was well understood that Mush has secured a safe exit before he left the place and he has not left any space for any further action. Now this can have only two implications i.e. it was unavoidable to give him this passage or in some way the present establishment has followed the trend by which they have kept an option for themselves open, in case the time arrives and use the same path. This action has left the 160 million Pakistanis once again depending upon the shoulders of Supreme Court to answer the call, as the corridors of power have simply stopped exercising the authority.


Posted

in

by

Tags:

Comments

33 responses to “Sovereign Pakistani Parliament Cannot Convict Musharraf”

  1. James Killian Spratt Avatar

    @LTG Khan: *Gern geschehen! Und guten Tag an Sie, Herr General!* (You’re welcome! And good day to you, General, Sir!)

    I was born in Germany but was brought to the US as a small child. I was naturalized as a US citizen when I was twenty years old. Both my parents spoke German, and mine is pretty good. Languages are fun, I think. We can defeat Babel.

  2. Lt. General Ayub Khan Avatar

    Thanks Jillian!

    Sir where are you from by the way? Are you german? All I know is ‘Gutten tach’ 🙂

  3. James Killian Spratt Avatar

    @Lt. General Khan: Hand SALUTE and “Yes, SIR!”

    And another salute from kneeling position for your *Schaferhund.* “ARF! ARF!” (I said that in German.) 🙂

  4. Lt. General Ayub Khan Avatar

    All these vendettas will get us nowhere.

    Many other issues to focus on. PPP knows they cannot try to bring General (retd.) Musharraf Saab to trial, because he is the one who allowed their sorry asses to come to power in the first place (allowing this benazir into the country, despite warnings about her safety)

    Focus on the real Goddam issues. I respect Shabaz Sharif unconditionally, but his brother is a bloody bald-headed twit. And I say it without remorse.

  5. Shakir Lakhani Avatar

    James, there’s no control over sale of weapons in our country, although one does require a license to possess a firearm, but no one follows the rules here. And most killings take place where the proliferation of weapons is highest (the badlands in the north and west of Pakistan).

  6. Momina Avatar

    @JKS: I am not sure but i don’t think there is much restriction over weapons. anyone may have it.
    and i don’t even know how many Pakistanis have been murdered. Someone who is in the location would be able to give more details.

    Also, check teh link that Kashif A has given.
    here it is again: http://tinyurl.com/nbmawj

  7. James Killian Spratt Avatar

    I wonder if those 7000 Yanks would be in Pakistan if Musharraf were still in the driver’s seat? And if you can set your (understandable) indignation at the fact that they are in your homeland aside for a minute, what do you think they’re doing there? Is there a SOFA (Status Of Forces Agreement–agreed by the governments of two nations establishing legal jurisdiction over occupying or visiting forces)?

    @Momina: So how many Pakistanis have these guys shot? Did they open fire or were they returning fire? And what is the level of private armament among the citizens on the street in Pakistan? What types of weapons are allowed for concealed carry, automatic or fully automatic, allowed to be kept in homes, gun licensing and permits and such?

    Since 9/11 in America, all but two US states have shifted to “shall issue” permits for carrying of concealed weapons by the American public, and Americans have armed like I’ve never seen before. The authority to issue is in the hands of local Sheriffs, who know their people. The situation has become like Switzerland at the outbreak of World War II–the Nazis did not dare try to take Switzerland because every man in every house was armed; it would have taken all the Germans had to crack it, so they bypassed Switzerland.

    An armed society is a polite society. Those who turn their swords into plowshares will be plowing for those who don’t. The tree of freedom must occasionally be watered with the blood of patriots and tyrants. And all that stuff, which is hard to argue with because it’s true.

  8. Momina Avatar

    @Irfan: Fully agree with you.

    @Hamid: Lol@Definition. Perfectly put.

  9. Lt. General Ayub Khan Avatar

    parliament will probably try to indict and have General (retd.) Musharraf arrested, over the whole Bugti drama

    this zardari is (rightfully) trying to reconcile the Baluch situation…..so they may try to throw them a bone by arresting him

    will he convicted or not — who knows. A lot of people (like myself) still support him in one way or another. He’s done a HELL of a lot of good for this country and his judgement is good.

    Bugti drama was a big mistake though. The man (in my opinion) should not have been taken out. He could have helped reconcile. But i’d rather not comment further.

  10. Hamid Abbasi Avatar

    @ US Definition of Democracy

    government of my people,,to opress the others,, for my ultimate pleasure

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *