Hijaab: The Veil is My Pride

Hijaab VeilWhy is it that people are so offended to see someone protect their chastity and adopt their religious belief? It is not just non-Muslims who feel suffocated seeing a lady adhering to the hijaab but also some ‘liberal’ Muslims. To me the liberal part of such Muslims is just their liberty from clothes and not a liberal mind. The words of French revolutionary Madame Roland come to mind: “O liberty! O liberty! What crimes are committed in thy name!”

What a Muslim woman wears is no one’s business; others may go around butt naked if they wish to, they are digging a perfect spot to get hold of the maximum heat of hell-fire.

A couple of years back when I went to Pakistan some of my relatives were very disturbed to see me observe purdah from non-mahram male relatives. They ‘reasoned’ that I do not have an Islamic education (I didn’t at that time) so why should I act so differently from the ‘normal’ folk? Well, I guess my knowledge was limited and I was not aware that the rules of Islam are not binding on every Muslim, only those who study the religion officially.

One of the other arguments was how can I continue to be modern if I have to be Islamic. They just don’t blend. They scoffed at a relative who said he would bring up his daughter as a modern, Islamic girl. All I was upset about was that I got an incompetent thesaurus that does not give western as one of the synonyms for modern! For beginners, Islam is a very modern religion and a religion of all times. Islam is the religion that honors and guards everyone and everyone’s rights. No man-made law is capable of all this, modern and Islam goes hand-in-hand.

People seem to have formed a preconceived notion that women who stick to hijaab have all entered a time machine that they stumbled upon in their stone-age era. Thus, these ‘progressive’ people are exposed to such a criminal sight. What a misery for the beholder!

The West has labeled a woman who sheds off her clothes as a progressive woman (progressing in taking off her clothes?). We are fed with the idea that a successful, assertive and strong woman is one who wears mini-skirt suits and her independence is seen in her diminishing attire.

Women are simply used as a marketable commodity. She has no self-recognition. Her attire is her recognition. So who is the one who is subjugated and oppressed? The woman who follows her religious beliefs with all her heart and protects herself from lustful eyes or the woman who is forced to give in to the latest fashion trend. This is possibly the prime reason why a Muhaajib is feared and derided. She clearly sends a message of her faith and of her not getting involved in the sexual plaything position assigned to her in the Western society.

Why else would her covering herself be a thorn in anyone’s side? Is she taking away their ‘freedom’ by covering herself? Hijaab is a religious statement but weird and biased minds have turned it into a political statement-a statement of rebellion against those who disapprove of it.

A counter cashier is dismissed from her job because she wears hijaab, in the West. She is condemned and there is shock and ‘reasoning’ made that this is against the staff uniform. An Islamic bank in an Islamic country decides to implement the hijaab as part of the staff uniform. That is condemned and considered an act of injustice and oppression.

The so-called secularists do not realize that their blatant hatred against hijaab has become the fuel of the hijaab drive. After the atrocities directed at Muslims in the US. we witnessed the number of Muslim converts had drastically increased, much more than ever before.

To the doubtful Muslims, stop searching for some sheikhs and qadhis who kowtow to your wrong beliefs. Accept what Allah SWT has clearly said,

O Prophet! Tell thy wives and daughters, and the believing women, to draw their outer garments around them (when they go out or are among men). That is better in order that they may be known (to be Muslims) and not molested. And Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful. [Qur’an, Surah Al Ahzab :59]

And,
Say to the believing man that they should lower their gaze and guard their modesty; that will make for greater purity for them; and Allah is well acquainted with all that they do. And say to the believing women that they should lower their gaze and guard their modesty; that they should not display their beauty and ornaments except what (must ordinarily) appear thereof; that they should draw their veils (khimar) over their bosoms and not display their beauty except to their husbands, their fathers, their husband’s fathers, their sons, their husbands’ sons, their brothers or their brothers’ sons, or their sisters’ sons, or their women, or the slaves whom their right hands possess, or male servants free of physical needs, or small children who have no sense of the shame of sex; and that they should not strike their feet in order to draw attention to their hidden ornaments. And O ye Believers! Turn ye all together towards Allah, that ye may attain Bliss. [Qur’an, Surah Noor : 31]


Note: Hijaab is compulsory on both men and women in Islam. Obviously, there is a difference in each gender’s rulings.
Covering of the head is favored in the New Testament.
Throughout the Western history as well, noble women used the veil while prostitutes did not.


Posted

in

by

Tags:

Comments

63 responses to “Hijaab: The Veil is My Pride”

  1. Hend Avatar
    Hend

    Regarding the princeton study, it does not prove anything useful other than what we already know.

    A rapist does not chose his victim based on her clothes.
    It is not as simple as less clothes = more rape, had it been so then most rapes would have occurred on beaches.

  2. Hend Avatar
    Hend

    SL

    I have mentioned the complex history or Muslim-Hindu relations in the sub continent which includes Pakistan and which includes the partition days. The ethnic turmoil in India was much more than in Pakistan because India has 15 or 18% Muslim community. Pakistan has maybe 1-2%. During riots it was common that each community committed atrocities in areas in which it had numerical majority. There are numerous examples and incidents of such…which I will not go into. My point is Gujarat is one case in the long chain of events which have happened and to only speak of Gujarat that to in an unrelated thread and that too without even understanding why riots take place or why mobs behave in a certain way or what is the role of politicians and anti-social elements, does not make sense. Many times it is found out that people who actually take part in riots are nothing but settling personal scores against their personal enemies by operating within a mob.

    I do not know about riots in Pakistan and you could be right because even to have a riot, you need a critical mass of people of certain community. Maybe there are just too few Hindus in Pakistan for that.

    You know two Hindus who went to India and returned but perhaps you have not heard of thousands of Hindus and Muslims both from Pakistan and India, who left their ancestral houses, whose women were raped, relatives were massacred – and who never went back to their lands?

    Please … let us not draw simplistic conclusions…the idea here is not to prove who is better than the other or even whether Hindus of Pakistan are safer than Muslims of India or who has more opportunities…based on hearsay.

  3. Faraz Avatar
    Faraz

    @Shakir

    A Princeton study showed that men objectify women who are more scantily clad. In fact, upon seeing women in increasing stages of undress, they were more likely to act with their hands to touch.

    Here’s a link just so you don’t think I’m making it up: http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/02/19/women.bikinis.objects/index.html

  4. Shakir Lakhani Avatar

    @ Hend: as far as Hindus are concerned, there have not been any anti-Hindu riots in Pakistan since partition. Let me tell you that Hindus feel safer in Pakistan than in India. In fact I know two Hindus who went to live in India, then returned after three years because they thought Pakistan provided more opportunities to them.

  5. Hend Avatar
    Hend

    MO

    I have no problem if you mention Gujarat in order to enhance the point you are trying to make and if it is relevant to the thread of discussion however in this case it is not, here is why.

    The history of riots in the sub-continent is long and complex, right from the partition and possible before. It is unfortunate but atrocities have happened from both sides. Almost every incident can be linked to something that happened previously or some kind of provocation. Gujarat -> Godhra -> 1993 blasts – > Babri Masjid -> Bhagalpur … -> partition … the list will go on. As intellectuals or thinkers, we have to understand these facts specially in the context of Hindu – Muslim relations in the subcontinent. It is not as simple as some people just deciding to harrass other community one fine day.

    Mind you, Just as there are videos and CD/ DVD of atrocities on Muslims, there are of atrocities on Hindus. People get to see only one side selected by the people who are trying to provoke them into action.

    When you raise a single specific incident selectively as an example of Muslims being raped for being Muslims, it does not serve any purpose other than inviting counter examples and counter allegations embedded in the past History. My intention is not to get drawn in it because it becomes a never ending debate and specially when I know that there is no side which is right.

    I am not sure why you link inferiority or superiority complex to mentioning such examples.

    MY

    I would also mention that there is no need to ‘avoid’ Gujarat just because you are speaking to an Indian…as long as the point is valid and relevant to the discussion. Your effort to keep the debate clean is commendable

    MO and MY
    Whatever happened in Gujarat is shameful but let us not remember only Gujarat, also remember the long History of riots. The history of the subcontinent and both sides is shameful in terms of riots and we have to remember that women are the biggest victims whenever such things happens. This is what I mean when I said “loosely mentioning such cases will only server to whip up passions and the debate will regress into endless allegations and counter allegations”

    Coming back to the topic of the discussion:
    I don’t think I can fully agree with MOs comment that a rapist is more likely to target a woman without a veil because a rapist is an opportunist who looks for things like whether the woman is alone, vulnerable, the circumstances such as location, time, chances of being found out, chances of getting caught and chances of woman going to police etc.

    In poorer and more conservative societies many times rapes happen because the rapist thinks that the woman will not go to police or he will not be convicted when the judicial system might favour a man over a woman.

    It is well known that a rapist is unlikely to target a woman who is very likely to fight back or go to police which could be the case with many women who appear confident and strong and go without a veil.

    I veil on the other hand may serve the purpose of protecting a woman from eve teasers and lustful stares but it is doubtful if it can discourage a rapist.

  6. Momina Avatar

    @Yusha: Hend or whoever doesn’t come with a declaration that they are indians or otherwise and i am not interested in anyone’s nationality. Facts will remain facts.

    And get over your inferiority complex.

    @SL: If you read my previous comment you will get the answer to your present question.

  7. Shakir Lakhani Avatar

    @ Momina: do you mean to say that no rape incidents occur in places where women wear the abaya or the all-enveloping burkha? Does a rapist turn into a mild-mannered, decent gentleman when he sees a burkha-clad woman?

  8. Mohammad Yusha Avatar

    @Momina: You missed the point. The reason for avoiding the Gujarat incident is because if you are talking to a Hindu, it would be better to bring up an example that does not involve Hindus, because then it looks like you are trying to attack them indirectly,
    especially in a discussion where you are trying to keep religion out of the discussion.

    And stop with the overuse of HTML codes, because then it looks like you are dying for attention. I can say the same thing to Hina. We all know how to use them, but making the comment look fancy is not the aim here.

  9. Momina Avatar

    @Hend & Yusha: i didn’t mention the Gujrat incident just to talk about something. Yusha mentioned that Muslim women have also been molested. Therefor, i mentioned that such cases of atrocities againts Muslim women, as has happened in Bosnia or Gujrat or wherever it be, happened due to prejudice. Normally a rapist would target an uncovered woman more than a covered one.

    The Holy Qur’an (holi? the hindu festival of colours??) has mentioned that everyone should b treated equally-religion no bar…

    But that is a different topic and does not relate to this post.
    Before becoming a critique of Islam and Muslims, kindly study the religion first. Of course, you may make false and baseless accusations. Nothing new about that. 🙂

  10. Mohammad Yusha Avatar

    @Hend: You are absolutely correct. Molestation is molestion, and it is wrong, regardless of the woman’s religion. The Gujarat issue should not be raised to create differences. I actually wanted to point out westerners raping Muslim women in refugee camps in Bosnia etc, just because they are Muslims. Someone else brought up the Gujarat issue.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *