Petition against Pak Suzuki Motor Company

Comments

181 responses to “Petition against Pak Suzuki Motor Company”

1. 

   Ali

   January 26, 2007

   I have simply cancelled my plans to buy Suzuki. I was planning to buy the Alto but after hearing a lot of complaints and finally witnessing myself its front wheels getting jammed on hard breaking, I felt scared and sick to the stomach. I’m planning to buy either the QQ or Joy. I find both cars of acceptable quality but the issue is spares. I’m not at all concerned with resale.

   Reply
2. 

   Madiha Riaz

   January 25, 2007

   Kamran, Pak Suzuki must apologize from the whole nation.

   Reply
3. 

   Fahd Mirza

   January 25, 2007

   @ Kamran K. Kureshi: Great news, but only time will tell the authenticity of claim. Now what about millions of people who are already suffering from Suzuki products in Pakistan?

   Reply
4. 

   Kamran K. Kureshi

   January 25, 2007

   Dear victims-to-bad-experience,

   I have solid reason to believe that Pak Suzuki have taken note of this and other valuable feedback from its cherished customers and will now make the Pakistani people proud by exceeding their expectations in terms of quality and workmanship. Pak Suzuki’s production quality index will by far be better than that of India’s in the year 2007. This will result in higher quality Suzuki cars in Pakistan. I have no reason to doubt that the Pakistani white and blue collar work force at Pak Suzuki is more than proud of being part of a ‘World beater’ car manufacturing company and are hell bent on showing the foreign investor of world class workmanship. Please belive me when I say that the present workforce has been positively so motivated by the employer that they will happiliy be focused on meeting and exceeding the Japanese Industrial Standards through a system that ensures continuous improvement.

   Reply
5. 

   Qaiser Kamran

   January 23, 2007

   FRAZ, my friend last year purchased a brand new cultus and guess what, he has almost become a pyscho by now.

   BTW, atta post, this is. people have cried their hearts out here.

   Reply
6. 

   fahd

   January 19, 2007

   Anything even remotely resembling Suzuki is suspicious and sinister.

   Reply
7. 

   FRAZ

   January 18, 2007

   if any one has the same complains about cultus ,please let me know because i intend to purchase cultus , shortly.

   Reply
8. 

   Ammar

   January 17, 2007

   It is nice to hear that people has started criticising on the products and behaviours of companies towards their customers.

   I think people should stop paying (price own bundle of after purchase expenses) on suzuki Mehran and pay that money to some other competetor who is providing U Imported car although it is some costly but with lots of new features, equiped with new technology and more quality.

   But if U care about market value then it is obvious that new imported cars in the markets takes time to make its position which could be two to 4 years or may be more but I think this time period is enough for u to enjoy ur new imported car without spending extra money on its repair and just fuel & oil.

   Availability of parts is not such an issue as dealers of imported cars always have most of spare parts with them or they also do their efforts to make them available in the market. I think for such cars u don’t have to replace their parts too for next few years due to their quality.

   By investing in other competitors surely U will discourage the PSM so they should think to chage their designs and models and start producing quality products.
   If U all say me to fix the price of Mehran, I would fix it at Rs. 150,000/- which suits its quality standard and techenology.

   I said all that because of my experience of both Suzuki and Imported Vehicles.

   Reply
9. 

   fahd

   January 12, 2007

   @ Ahmad Khan: As there seems to be no response from the notorious PSM, I contacted their local dealers in Rawalpindi, and showed them the printout of this post and comments. They just were shocked and suprised as uptill yet in their opinion Suzuki had produced gems and people were just religiously attached to it.

   @ UTP: Sure, you reflected on same lines. I concur, but the point is how would you create the mass awareness about the crappiness of PSM products or for every low quality highly priced product for that matter?

   @ Kashif: Government is hell bent on attracting foreign investors and in joint ventures. In essense that is a good thing, but as you said there should be checks and balances about quality.

   Reply
10. 

    Kashif Aziz

    January 11, 2007

    @UTP: Right on target. If Suzuki is pushing crappy cars, we, the consumers, are to blame. We buy crappy products to encourage them to bring more crappy products out of the assembly line. We pay OWN to dealers and we compromise on the quality. In absence of any monitoring and monopoly control policy by the government, it is our duty to be vigilant and never compromise on quality.

    Reply