Indian Scientist Claims Pokhran Nuclear Tests Were Unsuccessful

Pokhran IIA senior scientist and DRDO representative at Pokhran II has admitted for the first time that the May 1998 nuclear tests may not have been as successful as has been projected and also emphasized the need for India to conduct more tests to improve its nuclear weapon programme. The Indian security establishment on Thursday reacted with dismay to suggestions by top nuclear scientist K Santhanam.

India conducted five nuclear tests at the Pokhran test range. Three of them were conducted on May 11 and two on May 13, 1998. The team which conducted tests was headed by Rajagopala Chidambaram and the Device was developed at the Defence Research and Development Organization or DRDO’s Terminal Ballistics Research Laboratory.

Santhanam has disclosed that the thermonuclear explosions conducted at that time were ‘actually of much below expectations and the tests were perhaps more a fizzle rather than a big bang.’

In nuclear parlance, a test is described fizzle when it fails to meet the desired yield. India had claimed at time that test yielded 45 kilotons (KT) but this claim was challenged by western experts who said it was not more than 20 KT. In fact, some scientists, notably top nuclear seismology expert Terry Wallace, then with the University of Arizona and now attached to the Los Alamos National Laboratory, put the combined yield of the three May 11 tests at as low as 10 to 15 kilotons. Two other tests on May 13 involved sub-kiloton devices for tactical weapons, which US scientists doubted even took place.

Santhanam’s view was shared by nuclear scientist Subramaniam who said “there was something wrong with the seismic signals which seemed pretty weak to me then. So I would tend to agree with Santhanam”.

The security expert Bharat Karnad said Santhanam’s admission is remarkable because this is the first time a nuclear scientist and one closely associated with the 1998 tests has disavowed the government line. “This means the government has to do something. Either you don’t have a thermonuclear deterrent or prove that you have it, if you claim to have it,” said Karnad.

The exact yield of the thermonuclear explosion is important as during the heated debate on the India-US nuclear deal Indian government is under pressure from the international non proliferation lobby, to sign the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT). It was said the disincentive the nuclear deal imposed on testing would not really matter as further tests were not required.

Brajesh Mishra, the Former National Security Advisor in the NDA regime under Atal Behari Vajpayee rejected top nuclear scientist K Santhanam’s charges.

He said, “Dr APJ Abdul Kalam who was scientific advisor to the Defence Minister in 1998 had openly said that the nuclear test in Pokharan in 1998 was enough and we could sign the Indo-US Nuclear deal. Dr Santhanam was working directly under Dr Kalam and both were present when Pokharan took place. That should answer any questions about the test.”


Posted

in

,

by

Tags:

Comments

55 responses to “Indian Scientist Claims Pokhran Nuclear Tests Were Unsuccessful”

  1. confused indian Avatar
    confused indian

    “if i can single out one ediot on dis blog…………”

    Mirror, Mirror On The Wall, Who’s The idiot Of Them All?

    No price for guessing, hamid knows all.

    Though i can refer you to Dr. Shakir to know how to reduce frustration, but i rally can’t understand reason for it? is it due to the reference of the films which your beloved daud bahi was not been able to duplicate for you, or the facts (mirror) which you concise never permitted you to accept, or or the mammoth effort you have to make before able to get invitation from dubai news paper.

  2. Hamid Majid Abbasi Avatar

    @hend
    what a pleasure to find a person who can read between lines, between dots and can interpret treaties which are on ground totally different…………
    i wonder where this aristotle of 21st century was hidden………..
    in case you were so good with the wb report…..may b you would have gone to the 1960 treaty yourself of which it is based………
    and just stick to answering rather than derieving results from my replies

  3. Hend Avatar
    Hend

    Abbasi

    In reference to my providing the World Bank report which rejected Pakistani objectsions, you said

    “well, in case only white skin or a label of being branded changes all, than i guess you have the verdict on your side………..”

    This is clear example of saying even World Bank is biased or it is wrong (if I give you abundant benefit of doubt).

    Giving vague and evasive replies, not admitting mistake, not reading the treaty, not accepting the verdict given by independant arbitrators and then making some arbitrary statements. Indeed I wonder what makes you shun reason in this holy month of Ramazan.

    It is amazing that every word that you write between your numerous dots is incorrect. It will be better for you to write no words but only dots ending with a full stop in order to make it more factual.

  4. Hamid Majid Abbasi Avatar

    @confused
    may b we will some day drink water out of electricity(if u claim it)….bt trust me ur celebrities(ash) will still bee marrying a tree first to fight away a demon……………how sick u r

  5. Hamid Majid Abbasi Avatar

    @confused
    if i can single out one ediot on dis blog………..i hope you understood……….
    come buddy how many proofs you want…………..
    nd SHARAM AT SHARAM AL SHEIKh………….may b this is what your PM is referred to…………who went back from his words while crying in the parliment………….GOD when will you be gifted 2 attributes……….brain and leaders………..
    nd yep Dubai……………i wud b bt not U…………coz u will be sick there may b Dawood Bhai will emerge………..isnt it in the style of Indian Media my confused mate?

  6. Hamid Majid Abbasi Avatar

    @hend
    furtration might be the right word for those who call justice as the cry of the weak…………..nd unfortunately you have qualified for that group………..
    in response to my arguments………..plz do visit it again I didnt say nything as WB being bias………….may b you are in a habit of making reality out of fantasy……..
    you had a report so did i pasted a report………….nd believe me it isnt my cousin who wrote it in my defence………

  7. Hend Avatar
    Hend

    @confused indian
    According to me india is definitely doing things in Baluchistan and Afghanistan, regardless of whether Pakistan is in a position to prove it or not. Pakistan is also doing things in Kashmir and Afghanistan. It is the nature of the politics and the reality between the two countries and they will continue to deny all this. We just have to accept this for a fact and try to deal with it each in its own way till they are ready to move on from this game to the next level.

  8. Hend Avatar
    Hend

    Abbasi

    Now that your argument or accusation collapsed, you are resorting to accusing the World Bank (the arbitrating authority agreed by both countries in this matter) itself of bias. This may be a better bet for you than pasting articles written by frustrated columnists. However unfortunately (for you) the Indus Water Treaty is very clear about what is allowed for both sides and therefore your basic argument itself is untenable.

    No hard feeling too, its not personal attack on you but I think the basic mistrust is built on misinformation. Many times if you get to the bottom of the things, it becomes clear that sometimes things are not what they appear to be…specially in South Asia.

    I am trying to be impartial here. I can assure you that if India were making any illegal use of the water, I would not be defending their position. Finally a farmer or a citizen or a human being who needs water should not suffer no matter which side of the border he/ she is on.

  9. Hamid Majid Abbasi Avatar

    @hend
    well, in case only white skin or a label of being branded changes all, than i guess you have the verdict on your side………..
    nd i did not start this referring episode……..i just quoted what really is the matter and the way it is………..your satisfaction in this case sorry to say isnt guarenteed…….
    from the foundation it has been proved that the whole concept is illegitimate so it doesnt matter you build a wall or break one down………….
    nice going and no hard feelings…….nuthing i said is a personal attack on u………

  10. confused indian Avatar
    confused indian

    @hend,
    like baglihar, pak government using same tactics in baluchistan case also, giving hardly any factual data or proof to talk about. and on that little information pakistani journalist who are hovering between third and second grade find their solace. i am right hamid?
    Sharm el-Sheikh ka pakistani sharm
    government of pakistan remain silent for long period, regarding information handed over to indian pm about india’s involvement in baluchistan, only to say that they will provide information when it will be available!!!
    pick up your standard hamid, dubai is waiting for you.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *