Indian Scientist Claims Pokhran Nuclear Tests Were Unsuccessful

Pokhran IIA senior scientist and DRDO representative at Pokhran II has admitted for the first time that the May 1998 nuclear tests may not have been as successful as has been projected and also emphasized the need for India to conduct more tests to improve its nuclear weapon programme. The Indian security establishment on Thursday reacted with dismay to suggestions by top nuclear scientist K Santhanam.

India conducted five nuclear tests at the Pokhran test range. Three of them were conducted on May 11 and two on May 13, 1998. The team which conducted tests was headed by Rajagopala Chidambaram and the Device was developed at the Defence Research and Development Organization or DRDO’s Terminal Ballistics Research Laboratory.

Santhanam has disclosed that the thermonuclear explosions conducted at that time were ‘actually of much below expectations and the tests were perhaps more a fizzle rather than a big bang.’

In nuclear parlance, a test is described fizzle when it fails to meet the desired yield. India had claimed at time that test yielded 45 kilotons (KT) but this claim was challenged by western experts who said it was not more than 20 KT. In fact, some scientists, notably top nuclear seismology expert Terry Wallace, then with the University of Arizona and now attached to the Los Alamos National Laboratory, put the combined yield of the three May 11 tests at as low as 10 to 15 kilotons. Two other tests on May 13 involved sub-kiloton devices for tactical weapons, which US scientists doubted even took place.

Santhanam’s view was shared by nuclear scientist Subramaniam who said “there was something wrong with the seismic signals which seemed pretty weak to me then. So I would tend to agree with Santhanam”.

The security expert Bharat Karnad said Santhanam’s admission is remarkable because this is the first time a nuclear scientist and one closely associated with the 1998 tests has disavowed the government line. “This means the government has to do something. Either you don’t have a thermonuclear deterrent or prove that you have it, if you claim to have it,” said Karnad.

The exact yield of the thermonuclear explosion is important as during the heated debate on the India-US nuclear deal Indian government is under pressure from the international non proliferation lobby, to sign the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT). It was said the disincentive the nuclear deal imposed on testing would not really matter as further tests were not required.

Brajesh Mishra, the Former National Security Advisor in the NDA regime under Atal Behari Vajpayee rejected top nuclear scientist K Santhanam’s charges.

He said, “Dr APJ Abdul Kalam who was scientific advisor to the Defence Minister in 1998 had openly said that the nuclear test in Pokharan in 1998 was enough and we could sign the Indo-US Nuclear deal. Dr Santhanam was working directly under Dr Kalam and both were present when Pokharan took place. That should answer any questions about the test.”


Posted

in

,

by

Tags:

Comments

55 responses to “Indian Scientist Claims Pokhran Nuclear Tests Were Unsuccessful”

  1. Shakir Lakhani Avatar

    James, try telling our religious scholars about asteroids, comets or other galaxies, and they stare blankly at you. Some of them even used to say that the Americans never landed on the moon.

  2. James Killian Spratt Avatar

    My casual horseback research reveals that there have been some 4000 nuclear devices detonated since 1945, about half by the US. It seems they are only good for destruction. We’ve tried underground explosions to loosen natural gas, water, and oil, but the products freed are too radioactive to use. The Russians tried to create natural harbors and canals, but the earth is too radioactive to walk upon for many decades.

    One summer evening in I guess ’67 or ’68, I was dropping my buddy John off at his house. He was standing by my open passenger door, saying bye-bye or some such when, just past him in the dark sky over his neighbor’s house I saw a yellow flash. I said “Johnny, LOOK!” and we watched in awe as two more huge, silent bursts, identical to the first, appeared equidistant to the left, like enormous fireworks. We watched in silence for maybe ten minutes until they faded from view.

    I was googling on nuclear tests a month or so ago when we were discussing North Korea’s nuclear hijinks, and it finally came to me what Johnny and I had seen–the very sobering realization that those three huge silent flashes were atom bomb tests, detonated just outside the stratosphere from Colorado.

    This would have been on President Johnson’s watch. Good ol’ LBJ, cowboy extraordinaire. “TEST BAN, MAH TEXAS ASS!!” The bigshot would give the order to launch, because it makes him feel like a BIG bigshot, and the nuke-scientist wonks, dying to see their babies go BOOM, would cheerfully fire them off, with breathless glee. I’m telling you, boys and girls, those guys need to be watched like hawks, at gunpoint. They’re playing patty-cake with the Devil.

    The best use for weapons-grade nukes is, in my unsolicited opinion, to deflect an asteroid on a collision course with Earth, or to crack some up for mining once we get farther into space. This would be skeet shooting at its finest.

    It’s raining here. I don’t think there’s any fallout in it. I like the rain, in the quiet, wee hours of the night.

  3. Hina Safdar Avatar

    @Confused Indian
    without reading my post u comment?

    The link in the last para refers to the clarification.
    Where There’s Smoke There’s Fire………..

    Note that Pakistan’s Nuclear arsenal is a worry for USA how can u doubt?
    take care of your patakhay………..

    ‘changai nuclear test’ =Chaghi nuclear test
    provide links which can open.:) lol

  4. Shakir Lakhani Avatar

    Confused Indian: you really are confused. After the tit-for-tat 1998 nuclear tests, the world’s scientists said that Pakistan’s nuclear program was more advanced than India’s. And even though 836 million Indians are earning only 20 rupees a day (forty cents), the Indian government is giving away a billion dollars to Afghanistan and spending precious money on sending rockets to the moon.

  5. confused indian Avatar
    confused indian

    @ Hina,

    without looking into clarification made by our PM. i take this controversy as a maturity of our scientific community. on the other hand i doubt that Pakistani scientist know more about changai nuclear test than ‘ptakhe phut gaye’, because of sketchy detail provided by Chinese scientist.

  6. Hamid Majid Abbasi Avatar

    @nomam
    for that you need politician elected by the masses………..nt those who are blessed by some one 10.000 miles away

  7. Noman Khatri Avatar
    Noman Khatri

    Why Still Government Of Pakistan Dont talk with Confidence and Guts to the Indian Government about pointing and spreading terrorism in Pakistan???

  8. Lt. General Ayub Khan Avatar

    funny how tables turn!

    indian army chief in 1998 told Pakistan to “accept the realities of nuclear india”

    In Pakistan we wont ever have to worry about such an embarrassment, because seismologists all the way in Russia/Siberia detected the unusual disturbance in the ground after we exploded the devices.

    i have seen on indian defence forums how some hawks are trying to use spin control. But the truth is, it really was not as powerful as they claimed it was. Indian PM Singh trying to retract the man’s statements.

    BJP and all other nationalists have found more controversy and furor to scream about.

    in other developments, their satellite has stopped working

  9. Hina Safdar Avatar

    From the scientists statement and Western observations it is clear that more tests are needed.

  10. Hamid Majid Abbasi Avatar

    @ hina
    intresting, may be this describes why Indians were jumping for that US nuclear deal,,
    nore improvement needed?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *