The Truth About US Justice By Yvonne Ridley

Many of us are still in a state of shock over the guilty verdict returned on Dr Aafia Siddiqui.

The response from the people of Pakistan was predictable and overwhelming and I salute their spontaneous actions.

From Peshawar to Islamabad, Karachi, Lahore and beyond they marched in their thousands demanding the return of Aafia.

Even some of the US media expressed discomfort over the verdict returned by the jurors … there was a general feeling that something was not right.

Everyone had something to say, everyone that is except the usually verbose US Ambassador Anne Patterson who has spent the last two years briefing against Dr Aafia and her supporters.

This is the same woman who claimed I was a fantasist when I gave a press conference with Tehreek e Insaf leader Imran Khan back in July 2008 revealing the plight of a female prisoner in Bagram called the Grey Lady.

She said I was talking nonsense and stated categorically that the prisoner I referred to as “650” did not exist.

By the end of the month she changed her story and said there had been a female prisoner but that she was most definitely not Dr Aafia Siddiqui.

By that time Aafia had been gunned down at virtually point blank range in an Afghan prison cell jammed full of more than a dozen US soldiers, FBI agents and Afghan police.

Her Excellency briefed the media that the prisoner had wrested an M4 gun from one soldier and fired off two rounds and had to be subdued. The fact these bullets failed to hit a single person in the cell and simply disappeared did not resonate with the diplomat.

In a letter dripping in untruths on August 16 2008 she decried the “erroneous and irresponsible media reports regarding the arrest of Ms 
Aafia Siddiqui”. She went on to say: “Unfortunately,
there are some who have an interest in simply distorting the facts in an effort to manipulate and inflame public opinion. The truth is never served by sensationalism…”

When Jamaat Islami invited me on a national tour of Pakistan to address people about the continued abuse of Dr Aafia and the truth about her incarceration in Bagram, the US Ambassador continued to issue rebuttals.

She assured us all that Dr Aafia was being treated humanely had been given consular access as set out in international law … hmm. Well I have a challenge for Ms Patterson today. I challenge her to repeat every single word she said back then and swear it is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

As Dr Aafia Siddiqui’s trial got underway, the US Ambassador and some of her stooges from the intelligence world laid on a lavish party at the US Embassy in Islamabad for some hand-picked journalists where I’ve no doubt in between the dancing, drinks and music they were carefully briefed about the so-called facts of the case.

Interesting that some of the potentially incriminating pictures taken at the private party managed to find the Ambassador was probably hoping to minimize the impact the trial would have on the streets of Pakistan proving that, for the years she has been holed up and barricaded behind concrete bunkers and barbed wire, she has learned nothing about this great country of Pakistan or its people.

One astute Pakistani columnist wrote about her: “The respected lady seems to have forgotten the words of her own country’s 16th president Abraham Lincoln (1809-1865): “You
can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some
of the time, but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time”.

And the people of Pakistan proved they are nobody’s fool and responded to the guilty verdict in New York in an appropriate way.

When injustice is the law it is the duty of everyone to rise up and challenge that injustice in any way possible.

The response – so far – has been restrained and measured but it is just the start. A sentence has yet to be delivered by Judge Richard Berman in May.

Of course there has been a great deal of finger pointing and blame towards the jury in New York who found Dr Aafia guilty of attempted murder.

Observers asked how they could ignore the science and the irrefutable facts … there was absolutely no evidence linking Dr Aafia to the gun, no bullets, no residue from firing it.

But I really don’t think we can blame the jurors for the verdict – you see the jury simply could not handle the truth. Had they taken the logical route and gone for the science and the hard, cold, clinical facts it would have meant two things. It would have meant around eight US soldiers took the oath and lied in court to save their own skins and careers or it would have meant that Dr Aafia Siddiqui was telling the truth.

And, as I said before, the jury couldn’t handle the truth. Because that would have meant that the defendant really had been kidnapped, abused, tortured and held in dark, secret prisons by the US before being shot and put on a rendition flight to New York. It would have meant that her three children – two of them US citizens – would also have been kidnapped, abused and tortured by the US.

They say ignorance is bliss and this jury so desperately wanted not to believe that the US could have had a hand in the kidnapping of a five-month -old baby boy, a five-year-old girl and her seven-year-old brother.

They couldn’t handle the truth … it is as simple as that.

Well I, and many others across the world like me, can’t handle any more lies. America’s reputation is lying in the lowest gutters in Pakistan at the moment and it can’t sink any lower.

The trust has gone, there is only a burning hatred and resentment towards a superpower which sends unmanned drones into villages to slaughter innocents.

It is fair to say that America’s goodwill and credibility is all but washed up with most honest, decent citizens of Pakistan.

And I think even Her Excellency Anne Patterson recognizes that fact which is why she is now keeping her mouth shut.

If she has any integrity and any self respect left she should stand before the Pakistan people and ask for their forgiveness for the drone murders, the extra judicial killings, the black operations, the kidnapping, torture and rendition of its citizens, the water-boarding, the bribery, the corruption and, not least of all, the injustice handed out to Dr Aafia Siddiqui and her family.

She should then pick up the phone to the US President and tell him to release Aafia and return Pakistan’s most loved, respected and famous daughter and reunite her with the two children who are still missing.

Then she should re-read her letter of August 16, 2008 and write another … one of resignation.

Yvonne Ridley is a patron of Cageprisoners which first brought the plight of Dr Aafia Siddiqui to the world’s attention shortly after her kidnap in March 2003. The award-winning, investigative journalist also co-produced the documentary In Search of Prisoner 650 with film-maker Hassan al Banna Ghani which concluded that the Grey Lady of Bagram was Dr Aafia Siddiqui.


Posted

in

by

Tags:

Comments

11 responses to “The Truth About US Justice By Yvonne Ridley”

  1. Hend Avatar
    Hend

    amna

    baby, she who calls the beslan mass murderer as shaheed, what makes you think ridley is a sane person? think as human first then as muslim. stop believing in such propagandists…at the cost of ignoring all other factors. love, hend.

  2. Amna Zaman Avatar

    Job well done mr ridley. She explained the situation very nicely. There is no doubt about it. But one thing Pakistanis must realize that if we all speak up as one voice, it does make a huge difference and we are heard!! Only if we had the same passion and energy for other crucial issue too!

  3. Hend Avatar
    Hend

    shakir there are different ways of saying the same thing. using one does not mean shunning the other. all india radio was not a standard bearer for hindi…it merely reflected the language competency of the persons who scripted the news…shaheed has not appeared suddenly…where do you get such ideas???…haven’t you heard of shaheed bhagat singh? or various other shaheed people in the freedom struggle? this word has also been used in various hindi movies for many decades…won’t be surprised if it was also name of some movie which i wouldn’t know since i dont watch hindi movies much.

    secondly, hindi is not based on only sanskrit. the modern indic languages of india such as hindi, urdu, gujarati, marathi, punjabi etc have multitude of influences though the base may have been sanskrit. they have absorbed words from many languages like arabic, farsi, english, greek, latin…

    i am not a linguist of sanskrit but i wont be surprised if modern derivatives of indo-european languages like sanskrit or avestan such as those mentioned by me and farsi adopted shaheed.

    there is however a hutatma chowk in mumbai which means martyr’s square.

  4. Hend Avatar
    Hend

    When used by journalists in media, it is always used as martyr or for glorifying the acts of the person like Ridley did but then from the information it is quite apparent that she is not really a neutral journalist.

  5. Shakir Lakhani Avatar

    Hend: as I said, upto the 1971 war, All-India Radio would announce, “Hamaray paanch jawan kaam aa gaye”, which, roughly translated, means “Our five soldiers were used (or killed)”. The word “shaheed” suddenly appeared in the official announcements in the Kargil war. This word is of Arabic (not Sanskrit) origin. There has to be an equivalent Sanskrit word in Hindi (for someone who sacrifices himself for the glory of his nation or his religion).

  6. Hend Avatar
    Hend

    I don’t know if there is a separate definition of the word for Hindus (since you asked) but in India, Shaheed means martyr and also sometimes used loosely in the ways that you described above.

  7. Shakir Lakhani Avatar

    Hend: the word “shaheed” has been over-used so much that it has lost its importance. Originally it meant “martyr”, usually one who was killed in war while defending his country or religion. I remember an old Mohammed Rafi song, “watan kay naujawan, watan ki raah mein shaheed ho”. Now even the Indian government used it for its soldiers who died in Kargil (the original expression used for a martyr in Hindi was “kaam aa gaya”). In Pakistan, any leader who dies an unnatural death like hanging (Z. A. Bhutto) or assasination (Benazir Bhutto) is referred to as “shaheed”. The word is sometimes also used for a person who dies in an accident while going to work or while on the job. A cousin of mine died in an accident three years back. His father (a prominent leader of a religious party) insists on calling him “shaheed”. I don’t know what Hindus believe, but according to Muslims a “shaheed” is immortal (alive for ever).

  8. Hend Avatar
    Hend

    Yvonne Ridley is a British journalist, correspondent and Respect Party politician best known for her capture by the Taliban and subsequent conversion to Islam. Ridley currently works for Press TV, the Iranian-based English language news channel.

    2003 saw Yvonne Ridley employed by the Qatar-based media organization Al Jazeera. She began presenting The Agenda With Yvonne Ridley, the Islam Channel’s politics and current affairs show, in October 2005.

    After the Chechen rebel leader Shamil Basayev (accused of the Moscow theater hostage crisis and blamed for the Beslan school massacre) was killed, Ridley wrote an article referring to Basayev as a “shaheed”, despite a noted Hadith of the Prophet Muhammad where the deaths of ‘enemy’ children were denounced

  9. Shakir Lakhani Avatar

    Strange, a foreigner is able to express the feelings of Pakistanis better than we can. Ms Ridley is truly a great journalist.

  10. hamid abbasi Avatar

    @Yvonne Ridley
    Salute to your dedication………….may we have journalist like borders like u

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *