Review of Spider April 2007

Citizen journalism is a misleading term, aimed at giving traditional journalists some serious creeps and undermining the authenticity of common man’s freedom of speech.

A common person hasn’t got any control over the media conglomerates. He hasn’t much say in the policies and propensities of TV/Radio channels, newspapers or magazines. Blogging, POD-casting and other form of user-generated content (UGC) is in vogue in the west, but in almost 11 million internet users in Pakistan, very few are aware of this phenomenon, and very very few take part in UGC. Also the existing paper/electronic media including Spider, doesn’t throw that much spotlight on this new Oracle, but they can’t ignore it altogether.

April 2007 issue of Spider throws a dim light on so-called “Citizen Journalism.” They tried to encompass a broad topic in just 4 to 5 articles in vain. Lets see what they have done this time.

Title: Titles have always remained the Achilles heal for Spider. This time it was as bad as before.

Until the page 38 from the total of some 121 or so pages of Spider, there is nothing to write home about. Then starts the cover story.

Cover Story: Faras Ghani’s DIY citizen journalism (CJ) was good but the concluding paragraph was terrible. Khawer Amir Khan’s smart article with a smart title surfaced some salient and thought-provoking points. Especially the high-lighted point that “Blogs have gotten so popular that even major prit and broadcast journalists have their own blogs.” Now Spider isn’t a major outfit or its journalists aren’t that major to have some popular and active blogs. Mohsin Siddiqui’s Amateur Hour tried to draw line between journalism and Citizen’s freedom of speech.

Software Review: If you want to have a look at only one Office 2007 review, then read Faras Ghanis this piece.

How-To: Ali Fareed, has lucidly and plainly described the confusing process of DVD ripping.

E-Security: At last after so many futile and scratching attempts Nizar Diamond Ali has produced something of a moderate value. His discussion about open or closed security issues has got some valuable insights, though they are not that much unique.

Tech Review: The intro to Trakker (pvt.) Ltd’s new service, the GPS based car navigation system is a very welcome puff.

Feature: I presumable suspect, she selected “Digital Organization” for her feature, because Humna Ishtiaq hadn’t anything better to write upon.

Music: If you are a music buff and always wanted to have your own little studio, please don’t, I repeat, don’t read this article by Madeeha Syed. You wont go far.

Website Review: Zaheer Alam Kidwai has done a very constructive review of a well-thought site.

Humor: I still mourn, why I ever wasted some precious 5 or 6 minutes reading the garbage written by David Ford. Very pathetic piece.

Hard Talk: Humza Mudassir, will you ever disappoint and allow me a leer?

Kidzone: Like a kid, I pulled a face, and went to next article without reading this section.

Gadget and Gizmos: Some cool nifty tools to play with.

Entertainment: Now, when a site like “Google Fight” is mentioned here, the section becomes “cant-be-so-bad”.

Others: Graffiti and Geekspeak also warmed the feelings.

Last Byte: The last and the least was a strangely useless piece by Mohsin Siddiqui. Only the cartoons were up to the mark.

Lets wait for the next issue of our beloved Spider.

Review of Spider March 2007

Review of Spider Feburary 2007

Review of Spider Janurary 2007


Posted

in

,

by

Tags:

Comments

13 responses to “Review of Spider April 2007”

  1. Fahd Mirza Avatar

    For All Dear Readers: For one thing, I am not at all anti-Spider. I have been a silent reader of Spider for all its 100+ issues. I have seen its best days. I have resonated with Spider and I have known how it ignited the passion for IT in the youth of this country.

    The thing is that I am just yet another person, who doenst want my Spider to drift towards blandness and uselessness.

    I am not a literary critic or anything, I have been a common reader, who loves to blog about the thing I care.

    regards.

  2. Denise Avatar
    Denise

    I agree with you Rukhsana, ive read his reviews for spider before and his feedback both negative and positive seemed welcoming but sometimes even a random strangers comment or criticism makes us think do we suck that bad at what we do or is there room for improvement?

    Im sure Fahd means no harm and i wouldnt want this thread to start a war. I just felt that even if someone hasnt written well should be given the credit for going the extra mile and efforts.

  3. Rehmat Ali Avatar
    Rehmat Ali

    I like the reviews, and hey make it snappy in May.

  4. Rukhsar Bano Avatar
    Rukhsar Bano

    Yes, the criticism should be for positive, and I dont think the author of this review is doing criticism for the sake of criticism. I think, this is his style, and its a nice effort on part of him to bring a rare desi review about a desi magazine. It also shows he thinks a lot of this mag.

  5. Saba Ali Avatar
    Saba Ali

    I left reading Spider, light years ago. Your reviews have touched those chords, which meet somewhere to those days, when Spider was my darling.

  6. Riaz Alam Avatar
    Riaz Alam

    I re-soundingly enjoyed your review. A sheer act of vocal common class. These all are the virtues of blogging that we could so easily tell what we feel.

  7. fahd Avatar

    Denise: wow, you already have given the verdict, that “even if you came up with something better, it would be stale.”

    So anybody writing on anything which has already been written, dont write upon it, as it would be stale.

    Anyways, you better read all of my reviews, especially the first one.

    regards,

  8. fahd Avatar

    Mustafa: Ummm, I dont think review was month late. Sure, it was late, but only 1 week. I have done all the previous reviews in the last 10 days of the month.

    Anyway, I will try to make sure, the reviews come before the next copy of Spider.

    Thanks for reading.

  9. Denise Avatar
    Denise

    I think ur criticism is 98% negative. Do you even appreciate the efforts of these writers.

    I read the April issue and i loved Humna Ishtiaq’s article. She covered the piece brilliantly considering how these days people dont have time on their hands for anything, let alone read a newspaper which is why they check out the online news coz ppl tend to spend more time online.

    I would like to see you write an article on the same topic. But then what shes written is pretty fresh, even if you came up with something better, it would be stale. Criticism is one, appreciating is another, try to appreciate critically, ur review would make a difference!

  10. Mustafa Avatar
    Mustafa

    In case you haven’t noticed the May 2007 issue is already out in the market. Your Spider review was a month late!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *