A Beggars Dream: Kerry-Lugar Bill

It’s a common scene in a third world country that you find beggars every now and then while passing through the streets. No matter how much you abuse them, make them realize that they are no more than a pesticide and a burden on the society, in the end they will walk by with all the prayers after you have tossed a 5 rupee coin out of the window. Well of course no different was the perception of US Senate after it passes a negligible package of 1.5 billion $ for Pakistan.

Being here nearly 10,000 miles away I and many like me have no real grudge with the amount, but it’s the conditionality of the bill which has really pinched every soul. For 8 years they have hijacked our national dream, have given us a war that wasn’t our originally, taken our sovereign right of existence and in the end they have repaid us in a manner which shouldn’t be strange to the realist, but of course we have for long turned into an idealist masses, linking false expectations and desires from an outside power.

Just a day has passed when I came across a very interesting discussion on a private channel which also featured Pakistan’s Ambassador to USA Hussain Haqqani. In the end he summed up with two logics, which I could derive. Firstly, he threw every thing into the parliament’s basket by stating clearly that it holds the power to reject in case it is not acceptable. Of course, all we hear from our top establishment is the claim that we have moved into a true democratic era and it’s the parliament that will reign. So one is still optimistic that the opposition will move out from its “friendly” status and the ruling coalition will also take it as a disgrace on our sacrifices for the global peace (although we still have Nizam e Adal episode in our memory). To this extent Mr. Haroon was absolutely right. In the later part he argued that it was a draft by US senate and it’s their exclusive domain to add condition or make recommendations to whatever draft they pass.

Being the ambassador of a country like Pakistan which has served as a front line state in this war, it was and its his duty to project the real demands, efforts and accomplishments of his country and in case this is the result we have no other option but to say that it was no less than a diplomatic and foreign policy failure on behalf of our administration.

Tit for Tat is the name of the game. Just a week back there were reports circulating that Mr. Haqqani personally protested against the rejection of visas to certain US individuals, which were found involved in anti Pakistan activities. May be he should have taken some time out to protest baseless predator attacks inside Pakistan for the last many years, US involvement in the insurgency taking place in NWFP and the perception US high ups carry regarding Pakistan.

On the other hand the bill as one critic called has been drafted it seems by some special lobbies in US rather than the senate itself. From Dr Qadeer to Muridke, intervention into Armed forces to out intelligence networks this has been one pathetic draft in history that has no match. It is high time that once and for all US must be shown the exit door. A start has been taken in case of the raid on “inter risk” for its suspicious activities and it is required that more actions must be taken to put a halt to US involvement inside Pakistan.


Posted

in

,

by

Tags:

Comments

23 responses to “A Beggars Dream: Kerry-Lugar Bill”

  1. Hend Avatar
    Hend

    Abbasi

    Let me make three points clear.

    First, I am not trying to prove that Indian media is more free or Pakistan media is less free. I only responded because Shakir tends to propagate such opinions without giving any basis. Take Indian or Pakistani media they are both not free, regardless of these rating points etc. so its rather crazy to even claim one as being free-er than other. Moreover as Mohamed pointed out, media is never free, they always have an agenda decided by their owners and their clients. Let us be very clear on that.

    Secondly, I am perhaps the worst critic of Indian media which includes names like Time of India, NDTV etc. A simple word to describe them is ‘rabid’. They have no ethics and they are totally in gutters. I personally feel that Pakistan media is ‘comparatively’ decent but in any case I will not vouch for any media from anywhere, they are fakes.

    Lastly take any media, Indian or Pakistani, they are extremely biased. Not only against each other but even within the country against different sections based on their political and commercial agendas. The feed people with selective and twisted stories.

    All of us must realize this and not trust the media blindly because they are like vultures who will lead you to a predator and wolves who would pretend to be a dog.

  2. Hamid Majid Abbasi Avatar

    @hend
    i might agree with your point that Indian media is free…….but let me make one thing clear here is that they have hardly shown maturity when it matters,, especially in INDO PAK case……and media whether free but misleading is no less than a time bomb waiting for explosion…..

  3. Hend Avatar
    Hend

    If the first link does not work then use this

    ( copy and paste the link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Reporters_Without_Borders_2008_Press_Freedom_Rankings_Map.svg )

  4. Shakir Lakhani Avatar

    @ Mohamed: “The same is the case in Pakistan, where Mir Shakil ur Rehman (of the Dawn and GEO you subscribe to) who reportedly claimed, “I’m the evergreen ruler of Pakistan—I can bring down a government and form a new one!”. He is the real “king maker”. ” I’ll be grateful if you could let me know when and where he said all this, so I can show it to him (I’ve known him since he was a kid). Also, he has no connection with DAWN (so much for your knowledge of Pakistani media). Finally, he’s not the richest person in Pakistan. There are many Pakistanis who are richer than him.

  5. Mohamed Avatar
    Mohamed

    @James:
    `What’s your read on the difference between “bribing pathetic stooges” and “paying your employees?” ’

    “Paying your employees” is ok, as long as you don’t employ democratically elected governments. The people in a democracy imagine the government and bureaucrats are “public servants”, they might feel offended if their government has an external master. Which inevitably would result in conflict of interest and the people might want to yell back “for heaven’s sake this is a democracy! Please respect it!”

    @Shakir:
    Read Pakistani English language newspapers (”The News” & “DAWN”, they’re available online) and read how we criticize our government leaders and bureaucrats. This kind of freedom is not available to people in most Muslim countries (except perhaps Turkey). Even the Indian media is not as free as ours is.

    You are right in pointing to the power of the media. However, that’s how it works in a democracy. Take the upcoming UK elections for example, there is little hope for Gordon Brown’s labour party after Media Mogul Rupert Murdoch’s tabloid SUN defected them, ending a 12-year-long support:

    – “Doggedly, Mr Brown stuck to a prepared line that it was the people who decided elections, not newspapers”.
    – “Later, in a BBC interview, Mr Brown again shrugged off The Sun’s defection, but his irritation was clear.”
    reports Times Online

    The same is the case in Pakistan, where Mir Shakil ur Rehman (of the Dawn and GEO you subscribe to) who reportedly claimed, “I’m the evergreen ruler of Pakistan—I can bring down a government and form a new one!”. He is the real “king maker”.

    “It is estimated the 80 percent of newspaper readers read Mir Shakil ur Rahman’s publications and a majority of the public watches his TV and radio channels. Thus he is thought to be the strongest person in Pakistan. He is said to be the wealthiest and most influential person in the country as well…”
    Statemaster Encyclopaedia

    Typically, the elite rule the corporations and the media. America is not any different; to get to the helm of power any group has to struggle to get a grip over the media. See Who rules America?

    We are living in a time when people are heavily indoctrinated by what Noam Chomsky calls “Manufactured Consent”. Noam Chomsky says it best when he describes the propaganda model:

    “Now the elite media are sort of the agenda-setting media. That means The New York Times, The Washington Post, the major television channels, and so on. They set the general framework. Local media more or less adapt to their structure.

    And they do this in all sorts of ways: by selection of topics, by distribution of concerns, by emphasis and framing of issues, by filtering of information, by bounding of debate within certain limits. They determine, they select, they shape, they control, they restrict — in order to serve the interests of dominant, elite groups in the society.”
    – Noam Chomsky interviewed by various interviewers

    The people believe in set of beliefs that they are indoctrinated with, by the elite power groups and their media.

    See also:
    – The Sun sets on Britain’s PM Gordon Brown
    – Who really rules America? Vanity Fair’s `Top 100′ seems to confirm age-old `canards’ about `Jewish power’ – By Michael Collins Piper

  6. Masood Avatar
    Masood

    Well. Our leaders (so called) are not the reflection of what we are. They are elected in a system where there are dozens of political parties sharing votes. They rule us on the basis of a fraction of the total vote in Pakistan hence represent a minority of voters. If we do only one thing that is educate our nation about what is good and what is bad for us using media and if we burry correption deep down, I assure u very few nations will match our nation. Think about if the same Kerry Lugar Bill had come ten years ago, nobody would know about what the bill was and what the govt. did about the bill. Thanks to media that the Govt. is compelled to bring the bill to parliament for discussion. What happens there, we keep our fingers crossed.

  7. Hend Avatar
    Hend

    SL
    Can you explain the basis for your claim “Even the Indian media is not as free as ours is?”

    Not that I am a fan of Indian media but interjecting India when not required seems a bit obsessive.

  8. James Killian Spratt Avatar

    @Mohamed: Sure, mon. What’s your read on the difference between “bribing pathetic stooges” and “paying your employees?” My Dad had a saying–“Everyone is somebody’s n—–.” meaning we all work for our bread, giving something to get something, and no one except Tarzan is immune from commerce in some form. BTW, I’m not dodging you on the other thread, I’ve just been covered up with work. I’ll get to it.

    @Shakir: Very healthy to be able to complain to and about management. You never know who’ll come up with a better idea if some of the criticism is constructive.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *